09 Villa des Anges, Vin de Pays d'Oc Rose Old Vines
What is that taste? Nitrates? Cured intestine? Lard? Don't run away just yet. You've not only had it, you love it. It's whatever's embedded deep in the soul of great salumi. Finocchiona, a personal favorite, but also just outside the spice of coppa, in the fat of San Daniele prosciutto, crunchy Reggiano, red pepper flakes--the fruity red flakes, not the white seeds--on a spinach pizza. It's the reason you eat this stuff instead of pork tenderloin. I don't know what happened here, but clearly something did. Something is dying. I guess, in some respects, it really just tastes like time. I'm not saying this cinsault-based wine is in rigor, but maybe the guy who made it is. It's salt. Not Morton's per se--not even the good kosher stuff. It's what salt does to food. What happens to chicken fat after it's rendered off a great bird (this is the best fat in the world, porcine fetishists be damned) crusted in the crystals. I'm telling you. That's almost wholly the definition of great rose--taking the color and force out of red wine and replacing it with... seasoning. That's precisely what's happening here. Who cares how good the fruit is? Pump in some CO2, and you might just have Bouzy on your hands. This isn't tremendous in the way that you'd bring it to a tasting with your winegeek friends. It's more edifying. When you drink it, it's how you might feel after winning an argument with your parents. See, it makes perfect sense that I come home after midnight as long as I'm sober enough in the morning to drive my sister to school. You're an adult now. You make your own choices. That's all that this wine asks of you. Don't look to the ratings. For godsake, put your flavor wheel next to the Rolodex in your recycling. And try to focus for a moment. Focus on the simple, but pure watermelon and strawberry sweetness in this wine. The slightly pink ones you buy two weeks before the farmers' market opens. The insides of those candies that didn't really taste like strawberry but came packaged in strawberry wrappers. That's exactly what this tastes like. Somebody kill a tuna. It's a purpose, a minerality, that only good rose has. Rose knows it's a food wine. It knows, unless you live near a pool or in Provence, to never position itself on its own merits. It's a wine of... possibility. One that graciously complements you, extends your party. Sure, I'll have one more if there's any shrimp left. It's the reason you can't stop eating Chinese food. The umami of cured pork and absolutely nothing else. The wonderment of why we're still here, in this bar, on a Tuesday well past bedtime. It's a way forward. An amuse bouche. Something that will never accurately be committed to words. And while this rose isn't the first to do it, it does do it and that makes it great. That's what keeps us smiling.
From time to time, we accept sponsors at 750 mL, though they have no influence on the wines we choose to review. Along those lines, one of our sponsors this month, is offering half-off shipping when you buy a half a case of wine. If you're interested, use the code juneone to buy wine online. I have no idea if this wine is sold there.
From time to time, we accept sponsors at 750 mL, though they have no influence on the wines we choose to review. Along those lines, one of our sponsors this month, is offering half-off shipping when you buy a half a case of wine. If you're interested, use the code juneone to buy wine online. I have no idea if this wine is sold there.
8 Comments:
Nice plug for Wine Chateau next to the ad from winechateau.com What's up with that?
They offered the readers a discount. Seemed worth passing on. The banner is a paid ad.
Mmmm, It's not that. It's seeing quid pro quo promotion. If, let's say, a London theme named store was to offer your readers discounts, would you promote them in turn? Is it just the shipping that rocks about this place? What does the store offer beyond that? Have you experience with them beyond that? I can think of one place that is superior in most regards, no? I thought the theme of the blog was about describing experiences with wine, good bad or otherwise. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Not like I have a vested interest in the biz anymore. :)
Are you kidding me? I'm not promoting anyone. I never said anything "rocks" about this place. They bought an ad, and I'm placing it. There's not a recommendation anywhere on this site to any retail store. When people ask me where to find wines I write about, I direct them to wine-searcher.com. This site is built on independence, and I think my readers understand that. There's nothing new about web banners and promo codes. It's how websites function, and no different from what you see in the paper or on TV. Except that I do less of it than pretty much everyone else in the industry, out of respect for my readership.
The way it was originally worded, appearing at the end of your wine review, it read to me like you were using the power of your blog to direct people toward the Wine Chateau in order to take advantage of an offer. I think Drew's question is a fair one. If another retailer, one who didn't purchase banner space, sent you a wine offer to share with your readership, would you publish it?
Now for a separate question and feel free to say it's none of my business. But what is the purpose of 750ml now? For me part of the beauty was that independence, a complete detachment from commercial interests. That and the turning phrases to capture the emotion of wine and moments. Once you start making reference in your actual blog to folks who are paying you for banner space, well, that line becomes blurred.
Nothing's changed. As long as I can differentiate advertising from editorial, I'll be fine. The original wording in the blog post unintentionally came off as a bit promotional. What's different here, though, is that I took the time to change it. It's a good dialogue, though. I remember having a huge argument with the editor of a popular beer magazine several years ago because they were reviewing beers that had ad space on the very next page. It's a constant struggle. On one hand, sponsorship is simply the way of the web, and as this blog gets ready to launch a much-needed redesign to make it easier for readers to find things, well, I have to pay for server space. At the same time, publications like Wine Advocate are refreshing in how well they can go ahead with their mission completely self-financed. Look, I'm going to keep writing what I want to write, whether that's on this site or on the back of a napkin, even if it says Brawny on the other side. And every time we walk up to this line, I'll expect you all to keep me on my toes. Here, though, I think we're fine.
Fair enough. But what about Drew's question? If anybody from here on out sends you an offer to pass along to your readership, what will the policy be? All reasonable offers passed on or will it be strictly pay-for-play?
The bit in the post is part of the sponsorship package. So no, as a rule, I'm not giving out space to anybody who wants it. That's not pay to play. I don't recommend anything for money, even if I truly believe in it. That will continue to be the only policy here. But, when there's something particularly relevant, such as this--the only time I ever directly recommended a store--I will.
Post a Comment
<< Home